The Threshold
Conversion practices are rarely the dramatic scene the word suggests. Far more often they are quiet and slow — sustained pressure to change, suppress, or hide who you are, sometimes from people who believe they are helping. This four-part series is about that pressure: what it actually is, what the UK’s new law will do about it, and where it may still fall short.
The first three pieces work through the evidence and the legislation; the fourth turns to what a law built around “serious harm” can miss. Read in order, they build a single argument. Read alone, each stands on its own.
Start here
If you read one piece first, read the first. It takes apart the word itself — why “therapy” is the wrong name, and why the most common form of this is far quieter, and harder to see, than the stereotype.
The series, in order
-
1/4
What Conversion Therapy Actually Is
What the term really means, why “therapy” is the wrong word for it, and why the everyday version is usually far quieter than the one people picture. -
2/4
What the Conversion Practices Bill Actually Does
What the UK’s draft law actually proposes — how the new offence works, what it protects, and why the bar for a criminal charge is set deliberately high. -
3/4
Where the Bill Goes Quiet
The heart of the series: consent, young people, religious settings, and the hard question of whether a “serious harm” test can capture slow, steady pressure. -
4/4
Only If It’s Bad Enough
A personal reflection on what a high legal threshold may miss — and why naming something still matters, even when the law can’t reach it.
About this series. These four pieces move from what conversion practices are, to what the law does, to what it may not see — closing with a personal reflection. Each can be read on its own; together they make one argument. Where claims rest on evidence or legislation, the sources are cited in the individual pieces.