Pre-Phalloplasty Hair Removal: Donor Sites and the Neo-Urethra

CLINICAL · 3 July 2026

TL;DR

Why this is the most conditional of the four

The other hair-removal decisions in this series mostly ask “which method, and how completely”. This one asks a question first: do you need it at all? The answer turns almost entirely on whether the urethra is being lengthened so that you can urinate standing, from the tip of the phallus, and on what will line it. Most people having phalloplasty want to urinate standing, but for those who do not, or whose urethra will be lined with hairless tissue, the answer is “little or none”.

In phalloplasty with urethral lengthening, the penile part of the urethra has to be lined with something. In the classic radial forearm “tube-within-a-tube” design, it is a strip of the flap’s own skin, traditionally the ulnar (inner) border of the volar forearm, which naturally carries less hair; some designs place the urethral strip more centrally. In ALT phalloplasty, the thigh flap is often too thick to roll into a tube within a tube, so many centres build the urethra from separate tissue instead: a second flap (a radial forearm flap, or a groin-based superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator, or SCIP, flap), a labia minora flap, skin grafts, or prelaminated tissue. Other centres use a strip of the thigh flap itself, particularly in thinner patients, and at least one high-volume centre does this as its standard ALT technique, clearing the thigh beforehand. So the skin that needs clearing, if any, is whatever will line your urethra, and it may not be on the flap that forms the shaft.

Hair-bearing skin makes a poor urinary lining because retained follicles keep producing hair inside the urethra, where it is much harder to treat: mainly by endoscopic removal or laser, by repeated chemical depilating instillations, in some hypospadias case reports by laser through the overlying skin, or by surgically reopening the urethra. Phalloplasty without urethral lengthening does not create a skin-lined urinary tube, so there is no urethral hair to prevent; hair on the phallic shaft stays on the outside, where it can be treated after surgery or simply left. The fixed part of the urethra, built at the base from local genital tissue, is usually made from hairless tissue and does not normally need clearing.

Do you even need it, and where?

Establish these with your surgeon before booking a single session, because the answers change everything.

Urethral lengthening or not. Preoperative permanent hair removal is generally needed only for phalloplasty with urethral lengthening, and only of the skin that will form the neo-urethra. Without urethral lengthening, hair removal of the shaft skin can be done at any point after surgery, since that skin stays exposed. Confirm the plan with your surgeon rather than assume.

Which tissue will line the urethra. If skin from the flap is used, the strip is smaller than the whole flap but not tiny: in one radial forearm design it is about 4 cm wide and runs the full length of the urethra, and some protocols treat the whole inner half of the forearm. In an ALT phalloplasty, ask whether the urethra will come from the thigh flap, from your forearm, from groin skin (a SCIP flap, which can be hair-bearing), or from tissue that needs no clearance. Where a strip of the thigh flap itself is used, its exact position is harder to predict in advance, because it depends on where the flap’s blood vessels lie.

The urethra may be lined with mucosa rather than skin. Some centres line the neo-urethra with mucosa, most often vaginal or buccal (inner-cheek) mucosa and occasionally other sources such as uterine mucosa, either prelaminated into the flap at an earlier stage or added in stages. Mucosa grows no hair and is closer to native urethral lining than skin is. Some centres favour it partly to reduce stricture rates, though that benefit rests on retrospective series and expert opinion rather than randomised trials. Other centres prefer skin flaps, citing lower complication rates than reported for mucosa- or graft-lined urethras and noting that vaginal mucosa can be hard to harvest in one large enough piece. Where the urethra is lined entirely with mucosa, preoperative depilation of a urethral strip is not needed. Prelamination is not always mucosal, though: skin grafts have been the most commonly used prelamination material, and in one centre’s ALT series seven of eight urethras prelaminated with skin grafts developed strictures needing further surgery.

Other hairless routes. Some techniques build the urethra from hairless genital tissue, for example a pedicled labia minora flap in ALT or SCIP phalloplasty, or, in latissimus dorsi phalloplasty, staged reconstruction using vaginal and labia minora flaps followed by oral (cheek or lip) mucosa grafts. Its developers required labia minora at least about 5 cm long and 2 cm deep for the opening to reach the tip of the phallus (with shorter labia the opening sits on the shaft), and in their first series of 16 men, 6 developed strictures and 4 fistulas. Metoidioplasty with urethral lengthening uses local genital tissue, labia minora and anterior vaginal wall flaps, usually with a buccal mucosa graft, so it largely sidesteps the neo-urethral hair problem (it has its own urethral complications, which are a separate matter). In other words, the preoperative hair-removal burden is specifically a feature of urethras lined with hair-bearing skin.

What’s at stake, and what the evidence does and doesn’t show

The concern is not cosmetic, but it is worth separating what is established from what is assumed. Hair inside a urinary tube is genuinely problematic: it obstructs urine flow, acts as a nidus for stones and is a focus for recurrent infection. Case reports and small series describe urethral hairballs and stones after urethral reconstruction with hair-bearing skin, most extensively after hypospadias repair and also after phalloplasty. Those links, to stones and infection, are the most consistently reported, though almost all of that evidence comes from case reports. Hair can also narrow the urethra: in one series of phalloplasties, one of nine urethral strictures was attributed to hair growth in the neo-urethra, even though the donor forearms had been depilated, and some surgical groups regard hair as a common cause of stricture. But most strictures occur at the join between the native and the new urethra, where they are attributed mainly to poor blood supply at the junction. Reviews also list fistula among the possible consequences of urethral hair, on even less direct evidence.

Now the part that is easy to overstate: depilation is shown to reduce hair, not complications. The only dedicated study we found looked inside the neo-urethras of 25 transgender men whose urethras were made from forearm skin. The 14 who had depilation beforehand (laser, intense pulsed light or electro-optical synergy, about six sessions) had less hair in the urethra than on their other forearm, but no one had a hair-free urethra, and urethral hair was no lower than in the 11 men who had not been depilated (who had been left untreated because their forearms were less hairy). Voiding complaints did not track hair density. The study is small and short-term, so it neither proves depilation unnecessary nor proves it prevents stones or strictures, and its authors still recommend depilation to reduce the long-term risk of hairballs and stones; surgeons reporting a severe hair-related case after phalloplasty describe preoperative electrolysis as essential. Taken together, the evidence is low-level: removal reduces hair, incompletely; whether that prevents complications has not been shown either way; and no method is perfectly permanent.

Laser or electrolysis here

The same principle applies as elsewhere in this series. Laser targets the melanin in the hair, so it suits dark hair and needs a longer wavelength to be used safely on darker skin; electrolysis works on any hair colour, but one follicle at a time. Three things are specific to this setting. First, the evidence is thinner than for vaginoplasty: we found no head-to-head comparison of laser and electrolysis for phalloplasty, and the depilation study above used laser, intense pulsed light and electro-optical synergy, so the choice rests on the general colour logic rather than on trans-specific data. Second, some centres’ protocols call for electrolysis of the forearm urethral strip, so confirm what your surgeon expects. Third, testosterone increases body hair, with the effect beginning within 6–12 months and continuing for several years, so a donor site that looks sparse now may carry more hair later; any white, grey, blond or red hairs will need electrolysis whatever the colour of the rest. In our view, because the aim is to leave no hair inside the urethra, complete clearance of the marked skin matters more than general thinning.

Shaft hair is a separate decision

Every transfeminine hair-removal decision assumes the goal is removal. Here the shaft and the urethra are separate questions. Hair on the skin that will form the outside of the phallic shaft does not need to be treated before surgery, because that skin stays exposed and can be treated afterwards if you want. Whether to do so is an aesthetic choice, not a medical one, and it can be made in either direction after surgery. You might clear the urethral strip for function and leave the shaft to decide on later.

Timeline and the practical grain

Where preoperative removal is needed, it is the same months-long project as elsewhere in this series, because each session reaches only follicles that are growing a hair. One group advises waiting three months after the last planned session to confirm nothing regrows; another assesses at six weeks but doubts that is long enough. Have the surgeon mark the exact area, and re-check it if you change centres, because centres draw different boundaries. Electrolysis can cause scarring and pigment change, which is worth discussing for skin that will become part of a flap. Finishing beforehand is far better than dealing with hair afterwards: hair inside a neo-urethra usually means periodic endoscopic removal and laser treatment of any stones, sometimes repeatedly, and occasionally open revision. If the surgery date arrives before the skin is clear, what happens next is a decision for your surgeon. All of this sits alongside other requirements, such as stopping smoking or nicotine well in advance; centres ask for anywhere from four weeks to three months.

What to actually do

Related

This is the transmasculine counterpart to Pre-Vaginoplasty Hair Removal: Laser vs Electrolysis; for the cosmetic decision, see Laser vs Electrolysis for Facial Hair Removal.

Competing interests

The author has a commercial interest in skincare and a planned aesthetic hospital, and other declared interests, listed with the date each began in our register of declared interests.

Sources

  1. Zhang WR, Garrett GL, Arron ST, Garcia MM. Laser hair removal for genital gender affirming surgery. Transl Androl Urol. 2016;5(3):381–387. doi:10.21037/tau.2016.03.27. PMCID: PMC4893513. (Only phalloplasty with urethral lengthening requires preoperative permanent hair removal; shaft skin need not be treated and can be treated after surgery; urethral segment typically medial, where hair is naturally sparser, with treatment of the medial ventral forearm recommended; ALT urethral segment less predictable because it depends on the flap’s vasculature; neo-urethral hair obstructs outflow and becomes encrusted with stone; laser targets melanin and longer wavelengths suit darker skin; 3-month wait after the last treatment.)
  2. Pigot GLS, Belboukhaddaoui S, Bouman MB, Meuleman EJH, de Boer EM, Buncamper ME, et al. Effectiveness of preoperative depilation of the urethral donor site for phalloplasty: neourethral hair growth and its effects on voiding. Eur Urol Focus. 2020;6(4):770–775. doi:10.1016/j.euf.2019.04.005. (Retrospective; 25 transgender men with radial forearm skin urethras, examined by urethroscopy; 14 depilated by laser, IPL or electro-optical synergy (mean 6 sessions, range 2–10, recorded for 12) and 11 not; hair density compared with the contralateral forearm; depilation lowered urethral hair relative to the forearm but did not eliminate it, and urethral hair density did not differ between groups; depilated men had hairier forearms; voiding complaints not related to urethral hair density; assessment at least 6 weeks after the last session, with doubt that this is long enough; authors still recommend depilation. The assessment of the study’s size and endpoint in the text is ours.)
  3. Alba B, Nolan IT, Weinstein B, O’Neill E, Fritsch A, Jacobs KM, et al. Gender-affirming phalloplasty: a comprehensive review. J Clin Med. 2024;13(19):5972. doi:10.3390/jcm13195972. PMCID: PMC11477944. (Ulnar and centrally placed urethral designs in the radial forearm flap; ALT thickness may preclude a tube-within-a-tube design, with secondary grafts or flaps used instead; intraurethral hair may predispose to infection, fistula and stones; strictures and fistulae most common at the anastomoses; hairless labia minora tissue for the fixed urethra; staged urethra in latissimus dorsi phalloplasty; nicotine stopped six weeks before and after.)
  4. D’Arpa S, Claes K, Lumen N, Oieni S, Hoebeke P, Monstrey S. Urethral reconstruction in anterolateral thigh flap phalloplasty: a 93-case experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143(2):382e–392e. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000005278. (Tube-in-tube ALT urethra not possible in 94.2% of cases; urethra built with a SCIP or radial forearm flap instead; skin-graft prelamination a second choice with high stricture rates, 7 of 8 needing reoperation; skin-flap urethras preferred over mucosa- or graft-lined urethras; vaginal mucosa hard to obtain in one large enough piece.)
  5. van der Sluis WB, Smit JM, Pigot GLS, Buncamper ME, Winters HAH, Mullender MG, et al. Double flap phalloplasty in transgender men: surgical technique and outcome of pedicled anterolateral thigh flap phalloplasty combined with radial forearm free flap urethral reconstruction. Microsurgery. 2017;37(8):917–923. doi:10.1002/micr.30190. PMCID: PMC5697604. (Forearm depilated to prevent neo-urethral hair stenosis; of nine strictures, eight at the anastomosis (attributed to suboptimal blood supply) and one in the phallic urethra due to hair growth; SCIP flap may be hair-bearing.)
  6. Santucci RA, Linder ER, Wachtman GS, Crane CN. Planned and unplanned delayed anterolateral thigh flap phalloplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021;9(6):e3654. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000003654. PMCID: PMC8219258. (Tube-within-a-tube ALT as the centre’s standard technique at a high-volume centre; thigh hair removal completed in advance to limit hair growth inside the neo-urethra.)
  7. Al-Tamimi M, Pigot GLS, Ronkes B, de Haseth KB, van de Grift TC, van Moorselaar RJA, et al. The first experience of using the pedicled labia minora flap for urethral lengthening in transgender men undergoing anterolateral thigh and superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap phalloplasty: a multicenter study on clinical outcomes. Urology. 2020;138:179–187. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2019.10.041. (16 men, 10 SCIP and 6 ALT; hairless labia minora flap makes preoperative hair removal unnecessary; requires labia minora at least 5 cm long and 2 cm deep; strictures in 6, fistulas in 4; most transgender men having phalloplasty want to void standing; smoking stopped at least 3 months before surgery.)
  8. Falcone M, Preto M, Blecher G, Timpano M, Gontero P. Total phallic construction techniques in transgender men: an updated narrative review. Transl Androl Urol. 2021;10(6):2583–2595. doi:10.21037/tau-20-1340. PMCID: PMC8261414. (ALT urethral options: tube within a tube, skin graft or hairless genital flap, radial forearm flap, or pedicled SCIP flap.)
  9. Ferrin PC, Bene N, Berli JU, Peters BR. Flap templating considerations in radial forearm phalloplasty: a surgical teaching video overview. J Vis Surg. 2024;10:22. doi:10.21037/jovs-24-9. PMCID: PMC13225074. (Urethral segment about 4 cm wide; thin, often hairless ulnar forearm tissue.)
  10. Salgado CJ, Fein LA, Chim J, Medina CA, Demaso S, Gomez C. Prelamination of neourethra with uterine mucosa in radial forearm osteocutaneous free flap phalloplasty in the female-to-male transgender patient. Case Rep Urol. 2016;2016:8742531. doi:10.1155/2016/8742531. PMCID: PMC4812281. (Single case report; uterine and vaginal mucosa; mucosa closer to urethral lining than skin; split-thickness skin grafts the most commonly used prelamination material.)
  11. Salgado C, Yu K, Kenel-Pierre S, Gheiler E, Shao T. Phalloplasty in transgender men with and without urethral lengthening. In: Transgender Health – Advances and New Perspectives. London: IntechOpen; 2022. doi:10.5772/intechopen.102437. (Mucosal sources, mainly vaginal and oral; a prelaminated urethra avoids electrolysis because the urethra is not made from forearm skin; some radial forearm protocols require electrolysis of the forearm; prelamination with skin grafts; hair in the urethra a common cause of stricture in the authors’ view; smoking stopped 4 weeks before and after surgery; stricture rationale at expert-opinion level.)
  12. Bencic M, Stojanovic B, Bizic M, Djordjevic ML. Musculocutaneous latissimus dorsi phalloplasty. Indian J Plast Surg. 2022;55(2):162–167. doi:10.1055/s-0041-1740382. PMCID: PMC9398531. (Latissimus dorsi phalloplasty; staged urethra from hairless vaginal and labia minora flaps, then oral mucosa grafts from cheek or lower lip.)
  13. Djordjevic ML, Bizic M, Stanojevic D, Bumbasirevic M, Kojovic V, Majstorovic M, et al. Urethral lengthening in metoidioplasty (female-to-male sex reassignment surgery) by combined buccal mucosa graft and labia minora flap. Urology. 2009;74(2):349–353. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2009.02.036. (Buccal mucosa graft used in all 38 patients, with a hairless labia minora flap.)
  14. Lin-Brande M, Clennon E, Sajadi KP, Djordjevic ML, Dy GW, Dugi D. Metoidioplasty with urethral lengthening: a stepwise approach. Urology. 2021;147:319–322. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2020.09.013. (Buccal mucosa graft in 20 of 21, anterior vaginal wall flap and labia minora flap.)
  15. Singh I, Hemal AK. Recurrent urethral hairball and stone in a hypospadiac: management and prevention. J Endourol. 2001;15(6):645–647. doi:10.1089/089277901750426454.
  16. Xie L, Li S, Li Q. Surgical treatment and prevention of recurrence of urethral calculi associated with hairballs after urethroplasty. Urol Int. 2013;91(3):256–260. doi:10.1159/000353101.
  17. Verma A, Anand S, Sharma S, Sethi P, Agarwal P. Management of urethral hair following urethral reconstruction: a systematic review for evidence synthesis. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2025;30(4):438–445. doi:10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_20_25. PMCID: PMC12316425. (Hair as a nidus for stones and infection; endoscopic removal, lithotripsy or revision urethroplasty; also chemical depilation and transcutaneous laser; evidence base of 14 case reports and 2 original articles, 41 patients, mostly after hypospadias repair.)
  18. Maline G, Nguyen HA, Meagher M, Anger J, Lewis P. Hair-related complications in a post-phalloplasty neourethra: a novel staged urethroplasty approach. Urol Case Rep. 2026;68:103550. doi:10.1016/j.eucr.2026.103550. PMCID: PMC13449657. (Most men managed with periodic cystoscopic hair removal and laser treatment of stones; rarely more definitive treatment; staged urethroplasty to allow electrolysis of the follicles; preoperative electrolysis described as essential.)
  19. Yuan N, Feldman AT, Chin P, Zaliznyak M, Rabizadeh S, Garcia MM. Comparison of permanent hair removal procedures before gender-affirming vaginoplasty: why we should consider laser hair removal as a first-line treatment for patients who meet criteria. Sex Med. 2022;10(5):100545. doi:10.1016/j.esxm.2022.100545. (Electrolysis effective on all hair colours; laser ineffective on white, blonde or red hair; electrolysis risks include scarring and pigment change.)
  20. Hembree WC, Cohen-Kettenis PT, Gooren L, Hannema SE, Meyer WJ, Murad MH, et al. Endocrine treatment of gender-dysphoric/gender-incongruent persons: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(11):3869–3903. doi:10.1210/jc.2017-01658. (Table 12: facial and body hair growth with testosterone, onset 6–12 months, maximum effect 4–5 years.)

Revision history

Updated — 14 October 2026. The competing-interests section now summarises the author’s interests in one line and links to the register of declared interests, where each is listed in full with the date it began. The interests themselves are unchanged.

Corrected — 14 October 2026. Corrections after a claim-by-claim check against the full texts of the sources. The article said the urethral strip in an anterolateral thigh (ALT) phalloplasty is part of the thigh; practice varies, with some centres building the urethra from the thigh flap itself and many others from a separate flap, hairless genital tissue, staged grafts or prelaminated tissue, and the article now explains which skin may need clearing in each case. The unsupported statement that thigh donor sites are hairier than the forearm was removed, as were unsupported statements that some surgeons request donor-site hair reduction for aesthetic or procedural reasons; the statement that for many people the answer is “little to none” was narrowed to the people it applies to. The aesthetic argument for keeping shaft hair and a quoted surgeon’s view on forearm hair were attributed to a source we could not verify, and have been removed; the shaft decision now rests on sourced guidance. The depilation study is now described in full: depilation was by laser, intense pulsed light or electro-optical synergy; urethral hair was compared with the other forearm; urethral hair did not differ between depilated and non-depilated men, who differed in forearm hair; all urethras were made from forearm skin; and the authors still recommend depilation. The description of mucosal urethras now includes vaginal mucosa, notes that skin grafts are the most commonly used prelamination material and gives the view of centres that prefer skin flaps. Further hairless routes were added, with the requirements and complication rates of the labia minora flap. The account of urethral hair and stricture said hair was a hypothesised contributor; it now reports a hair-related stricture that occurred despite depilation, and that most strictures occur at the urethral join. The description of treating hair after surgery was corrected and now lists the options reported. Hair-related urethral stones are now documented from phalloplasty as well as hypospadias repair. Pigment change was added to the risks of electrolysis, and differences between centres in smoking cessation and in the wait after the last hair-removal session were added. The “explainer coming separately” promises were removed, and all references were completed and annotated.

Updated — 30 September 2026. Competing interests added. The author’s commercial interest in a skincare business and a planned aesthetic hospital bears directly on this article and had not been declared on it. The rest of the article is unchanged.

First published — 3 July 2026.

More Clinical

View all →